Drawing for SMARTSCREEN

USPTO serial 76976415

SMARTSCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2974813Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SMARTSCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel R. Leeman

Joel R. Leeman SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP125 SUMMER STREETBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic controls for remote or local monitor and control of material filter and separator machines, sold individually or as bundled or integrated systems, namely, electronic controllers, electronic computer monitors, and computer software that is embedded in or for installation in controllers of screens and controls or monitors components of filtering and separating machines consisting of ellipse screens, woven screens, finger plates, finger decks, grid decks, mesh decks, perforated plates, perforated plate decks, and wear platesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 26, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 14, 2011NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Dec 13, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Dec 13, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 26, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 8, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance