USPTO serial 76976530
BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D. BIRKHEAD
KEVIN D. BIRKHEAD PARKER MCCAY P.A.7001 LINCOLN DRIVE WEST P.O. BOX 974MARLTON, NJ 08053-0974UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [PRERECORDED COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING SCREEN SAVERS; MOUSE PADS,;VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING THE USS NEW JERSEY BATTLESHIP, AUDIO CASSETTES FEATURING INFORMATION CONCERNING THE USS NEW JERSEY BATTLESHIP, PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS, AND] MAGNETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2001 |
| 016 | [BOOKS FEATURING THE BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY,] PENS[, ADDRESS BOOKS, NOTEPADS, PAPERWEIGHTS AND LETTER OPENERS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 2000 |
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, PLAYING CARDS, CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS, TOY MODELS OF THE USS BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 2001 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, MUSEUMS, SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES CONCERNING THE USS BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 25, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME PORT ALLIANCE FOR THE U.S.S. NEW JERSEY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME PORT ALLIANCE FOR THE U.S.S. NEW JERSEY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BATTLESHIP NEW JERSEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |