Drawing for THE CARD CONNECTION

USPTO serial 76976586

THE CARD CONNECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CARD CONNECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Kohane,

DAVID M KOHANE COLE, SCHOTZ, MEISEL, FORMAN & LEONARD25 MAIN STHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Hobby crafts kits for making and decorating greeting cards, memory books, scrapbooks, photograph albums and wedding albums, comprising announcement cards, holiday cards, place cards, paper gifts tags, blank greeting cards, envelopes, stationery, paper ribbons, paper cutouts, and decorative components, namely, glue containing glitter, decorative glitter, stencils, artists' brushes, decorative adhesive tape, decorative accents, namely, stickers and rub-on, iron-on, and plastic transfers and patches containing pictures and sayings, charms, cording, decorative ribbons made of textiles, eyelets, ornamental novelty buttons, cloth cutouts, miniature knitted goods in various shapes and miniatures, namely, wire and metal shapes and letters and clothespinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 23, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Mar 22, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 12, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance