USPTO serial 76976752
Serial No. 76976752
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76976752?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH LLOYD SERLING
JOSEPH LLOYD SERLING SERLING ROOKS & FERRARA LLP254 W 54TH ST 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and accessories namely, jackets, coats, shirts, sweaters, pants, dresses, skirts, t-shirts, belts, scarves, lingerie and underwear; footwear; hats, headwear and socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |