USPTO serial 76976870
MEMPHIS ZOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2008
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MEMPHIS ZOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yan Yang
Memphis Zoo, Inc.2000 Prentiss PlaceMemphis, TN 38112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | sculptures and statuettes of non-precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Souvenir collector spoons ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | costume jewelry; lapel pins; ornamental pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Wood gift and decorative boxes, plastic key chain tags; picture frames; sculptures, statuettes, and figurines made of plaster, resin plastic, or wood; hand fans; wood carvings | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | sculptures and statuettes, bottles sold empty; cups; mugs; drinking glasses; sports bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jerseys, sweatshirts, shorts, sleepwear, jackets, rainwear, socks, headwear, namely, hats, caps, visors and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | plush animals; Christmas tree ornaments; balls of all kinds, namely, golf balls, softballs, baseballs, playground balls; snow globes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Memphis Zoo, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Memphis Zoo, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Memphis Zoo, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MEMPHIS ZOO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |