USPTO serial 76977048
LAST LICKS SPORTS GIFTS & ICE CREAM SCARSDALE, NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAST LICKS SPORTS GIFTS & ICE CREAM SCARSDALE, NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL C LITTMAN
MITCHELL C LITTMAN LITTMAN KROOKS & ROTH PC655 3RD AVE 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SWEATERS, PAJAMAS, SWEATSHIRTS, PANTS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, GLOVES, JACKETS, SCARVES, CAPS, HATS AND JERSEYS, CLOTHING FROM PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE AMATEUR AND PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES IN BASEBALL HOCKEY, TENNIS, FOOTBALL, GOLF, SOCCER AND BASKETBALL, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEATPANTS, SWEATERS, PAJAMAS, SWEATSHIRTS, PANTS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, GLOVES, JACKETS, SCARVES, CAPS, HATS AND JERSEYS | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J. Free Candy Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by J. Free Candy Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LAST LICKS SPORTS GIFTS & ICE CREAM SCARSDALE, NEW YORK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |