USPTO serial 76977093
TRACEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRACEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Montgomery
JOHN W MONTGOMERY OSHA & MAY LLPSTE 2800, 1221 MCKINNEY STHOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Eye examination apparatus and instruments for measuring vision characteristics of the eye namely, aberrations of the cornea, lens, retina and total eye and for measuring wave front aberrations of the eye and component parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |