USPTO serial 76977278
HI!BILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2005
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HI!BILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
13 Forest DriveWarren, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GAMING MACHINES, SLOT MACHINES,CASINO GAMBLING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFORE; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC GAMING AND GAMBLING MACHINES; GAMING MACHINES; GAMING MACHINES FEATURING SLOT MACHINE TYPE GAMES VIA VIDEO DISPLAYS; COIN-OPERATED GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GAMBLING MACHINES, SLOT MACHINES, VIDEO SLOT MACHINES, CASINO GAMBLING MACHINES, VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES AND DISCS; FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE FEATURING ACTION FILMS AND SIMULATED GAMES FOR USE IN ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC GAME, AMUSEMENT AND GAMBLING APPARATUS, DEVICES AND MACHINES; DATA RECORDING APPARATUS, NAMELY, MAGNETIC DISK DRIVES, MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY FOR OPERATING ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC GAMES, AMUSEMENT AND GAMBLING APPARATUS, DEVICES AND MACHINES; VENDING MACHINES FEATURING CD ROM GAMES, CASSETTE GAMES, CARTRIDGE GAMES, VIDEO GAMES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HI!BILITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |