USPTO serial 76977290
SAV INTERFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAV INTERFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14, 3YP, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer security software for encryption, authentication, secure erasure, disc authorization and anti-virus protection; prerecorded CD-ROMs, diskettes, DVDs, and magnetic data carriers containing computer network data security programs; downloadable software and electronic publications in the nature of brochures, manuals and newsletters in the field of computer network data security | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books, booklets, magazines and newsletters concerning data security for computer software, namely, encryption, authentication, secure erasure, disc authorization and anti-virus protection; computer software manuals for data security software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |