USPTO serial 76977332
EMERSON PROFESSIONAL TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3722741Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERSON PROFESSIONAL TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Brennan, Lisa M. DuRoss
Michael P. Brennan, Lisa M. DuRoss Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.P.O. Box 828Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal brackets for truck boxes and ladder racks; metal tool boxes; metal storage boxes; anvils; metal pipe stands; metal storage and organizer products, namely, storage chests, tool boxes, doors, chests, and metal hardware and accessories pertaining thereto, sold individually and in combination, namely, metal shelf brackets, metal casters, metal wall brackets, metal support brackets; metal storage tanks for liquid and gas transfer; metal casters and metal jaw covers for vises | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | sliding platforms for vehicles; industrial vacuum cleaners; power tools, namely, abrasive saws, power-operated core drills; power-operated drain cleaning machines; hydraulic knock-out sets comprising hydraulic punches; pipe and bolt threading machines; pipe roll grooving machines; power operated pipe threading machines; power-operated pipe threading equipment, namely, die heads for threading machines, pipe dies for use with threading machines; power-operated geared threader parts, namely, die heads, die head racks, leg, tray, wheel and cabinet stands; machine parts, namely, carriages especially adapted for holding pipe and bolt threading machines; power drive machines, namely, machines for rotating pipe and rods; machine parts, namely, loops specially adapted for power-operated geared threaders; power operated machine parts, namely, support arms and pipe supports for supporting pipe during threading operation; power drill bits; power operated pipe roll groovers; power operated drain and pipe machines for cleaning drains, namely, power operated plumbing snakes, power operated drain and sewer cleaning machines, namely, sink machines, drum machines, sectional machines, rodder machines and water jetting machines; power operated drain diagnostic machines for cleaning and inspecting pipes, sump pumps, electric utility sewage pumps, electric semi-trash pumps, electric sewage ejection pumps, namely, power operated sink machines, power operated drum machines, power operated sectional machines, power operated rodder machines, and power operated water jetting machines; power operated pressing tools; manually operated pipe and tubing cutting machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | full line of manually operated hand tools for industrial, commercial and domestic use and replacement parts therefor and accessories and attachments therefor sold as a unit, namely, wrenches, ratchet wrenches, and adjustable wrenches; manually operated hand tools, namely, pliers, pipe roll groovers, hand tools, namely, taps, tubing cutters, conduit benders, conduit cutters, tube expanders, swaging tools for shaping pipes, sizing tools for conduit, deburring tools, wire strippers, cable cutters, cable trimmers, cable strippers, bolt cutters; manually operated hand tools, namely, tube end flarers and tube cutters, and tube benders; hand tools, namely, hammers and pliers; hand tools, namely, hacksaw blades; hand tools, namely, tube flarers, tube benders and tube cutters; manually operated tubing cutters; manually operated tapping machines; metal vises; hand tools, namely, toilet augers; hand operated drain cleaning tools, namely, hand spinners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | electric soldering guns; pipe inspection machines for inspecting pipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 24, 2001 |
| 011 | pipe thawing machines comprising thermoelectric heating units and electric power cables for wrapping around pipes; pipe freezing equipment comprised of refrigeration units, freeze gel and hosing for use in the plumbing field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | transport carts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | work benches; workstations having multi-use work surfaces for use in a wide variety of fields, comprising, shelving, cabinets, work tops, bin boxes and bin dividers, shelf work covers, file boxes and panels, sold as a unit; metal storage and organizer products, namely, cabinets, work benches, and drawers; metal drawers for metal tool chests; metal drawers for storage; metal drawers for metal workbenches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named EMERSON PROFESSIONAL TOOLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |