USPTO serial 76977359
PAUL FRANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2952829Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAUL FRANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, 20th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Frank Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Frank Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Paul Frank Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PAUL FRANK INDUSTRIES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PAUL FRANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |