USPTO serial 76977420
XAPPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2005
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XAPPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
69190 Walldorf, DE
69190 Walldorf, DE
69190 Walldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Genovese Miller
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely, catalogs, manuals, and operating instructions, featuring information on the operation of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, training in the creation, development, use, and application of computer software and electronic data processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Internet services, namely, the preparation and provision of data and information on the Internet about development, creation, programming, execution, effect, production, distribution, marketing, application, use, way of working, operation, modification, sale, maintenance, rental, updating, design, and outsourcing of computer programs and software; consulting services in the fields of design, selection, creation, development, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; research in the area of computer programs and software; creation, development and design of computer programs and software for others, in particular for business function areas, for example accounting and controlling, production and materials management, quality management and plant maintenance, marketing, personnel and project management, and general office functions such as word processing, electronic mail, and archiving; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software for others; rental of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |