USPTO serial 76977442
ECOCAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOCAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-60295 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
D-60388 Frankfurt am Main, DE
D-60388 Frankfurt am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Kramer
Nathaniel Kramer Kirschstein Ottinger Israel Schiffmiller425 Fifth AvenueFifth FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in manufacture of polymers, intermediates for polymers and solvents, initiating agents, activators, modifiers, catalysts, dye stuffs and inhibitors for the use in polymerization reactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |