USPTO serial 76977475
G GORGONZ PERFORMANCE WORK GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G GORGONZ PERFORMANCE WORK GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana O. Lynch, Esquire
DANA O LYNCH ESQ WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON LLPSEVEN ST PAUL STBALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, BOTTOMS, JACKETS; COATS; WARM-UP SUITS;SWEAT SUITS; SWEAT PANTS; SWEATSHIRTS; SWEATERS; BLAZERS; VESTS; PANTS;TROUSERS; SLACKS; SHORTS; UNDERWEAR; THERMAL UNDERWEAR; SWIM WEAR;LOUNGE WEAR; HEAD WEAR, NAMELY, EAR MUFFS AND HEADBANDS; MITTENS;SCARVES; WRISTBANDS; SKIWEAR; TIGHTS; FOUL WEATHER GEAR; BEACH WEAR;UNITARDS; BODY SUITS; FISHING VESTS AND WADERS; SLEEP WEAR; ROBES;CAFTANS; NECK WEAR; OVERALLS; OVERCOATS; PANTSUITS; SUITS; SUIT COATS;RAINWEAR; SASHES; BELTS; SHAWLS; SOCKS; AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES,BOOTS, AND SANDALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gray Matter Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gray Matter Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named G GORGONZ PERFORMANCE WORK GEAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |