USPTO serial 76977543
IN SAN FRANCISCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3048450Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IN SAN FRANCISCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy E. Moses
Timothy E. Moses Moses Law Group, LLC6 George C. Wilson Ct.Suite BAUGUSTA, GA 30909-6593Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing online information to readers via a global computer information network on the new and favorite arts, music, night life, and popular entertainment that define San Francisco | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2004 |
| 043 | Providing online information to readers via a global computer information network on the new and favorite restaurants that define San Francisco | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by In New York, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by In New York, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by In New York, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named IN SAN FRANCISCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2004 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |