USPTO serial 76977620
SKINCAREGUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKINCAREGUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, Bristish Columbia V6C 2T8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Humphreys
LYNN M HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care preparations and products, namely cleansing lotion, cleansing gel, cleansing milk, cleansing cream, cleansing bar, toner, moisturizing cream, moisturizing lotion, face cream, face lotion, hand cream, hand lotion, body cream, body lotion, body oil, foot cream, foot lotion, skin lotion, sunscreen, after sun body lotion, hydrating cream and hydrating lotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Preparations, remedies, namely drugs, ointments, topical treatment, and oral treatment, and medicines for the treatment of acne, sun damaged skin, rosacea, psoriasis, eczema, lupus, herpes, warts, and shingles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |