Drawing for EWM EXECUTIVE WEALTH MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 76977657

EWM EXECUTIVE WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3029959Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EWM EXECUTIVE WEALTH MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA W ROSAYA

LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of executive schemes, as well as distributing course materials in connection therewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2001
042Legal advice; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of software problems and maintenance of computer softwareSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 25, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2009RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Jun 23, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 6, 2009PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Apr 23, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2009ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 29, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2005CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 23, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2001AMPXAPPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance