USPTO serial 76977750
SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANCE C VENABLE
LANCE C VENABLE ELLIS & VENABLE101 N 1ST AVE STE 1875PHOENIX, AZ 85003UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Swellco Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Swellco Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |