USPTO serial 76977832
NIHILENT EVOLVING IDEAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NIHILENT EVOLVING IDEAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
Pune, IN
Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
Pune, IN
Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
PUNE, IN
Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
MAHARASHTRA, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
Robert P. Michal Carter DeLuca Farrell & Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadMelville, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Data processors; computers; ] computer software, namely, database management software, data compression software, search engine software, game software, graphics software, word processing software, software for use in downloading from a global computer network, software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from a global computer network, software for application and database integration, software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures, telephony software, and e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer operating system programs; [ computer software and hardware accessories, namely, drivers, mouseports, mouse, monitors, keyboards, memory cards, computer memories, memory modules, computer network hubs, switches, routers, joysticks, computer interface boards, computer game cassettes, computer game discs, computer game cartridges, computer fax modem cards, computer chips, computer cables, computer buffers, drives, printers and modems; computer peripherals and terminals; ] computer discs featuring electronic business software; [ blank computer discs; video discs featuring images and electronic business software; blank CD-ROMs, ] pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring database management software; [ CD-ROM writers; CD players; CD drives for computers; scanners; remote controls for computers; ] magnetic data carriers; [ calculating machines; cash registers; coaxial cables; computer cables; printed circuit boards; and magnetically encoded credit cards ] | ACTIVE | Apr 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Nihilent Technologies Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by NIHILENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NIHILENT EVOLVING IDEAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |