USPTO serial 76977859
FOODTRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3212154Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOODTRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
IN THE PROVINCE OF Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
IN THE PROVINCE OF Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
IN THE PROVINCE OF Prince Edward Island, CA
Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B COHEN
ROBERT B COHEN LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRESH, READY TO SERVE, FROZEN, CURED, SMOKED, CANNED, PROCESSED OR SEASONED MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PORK; PREPARED MEATS, NAMELY, DELI MEATS; FROZEN, CANNED, DRIED, MIXED AND PROCESSED VEGETABLES;PROCESSED POTATOES, NAMELY, ROAST POTATOES; EDIBLE VEGETABLE OILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | PROCESSED HERBS, NAMELY, HERBS AND HERBAL SAUCES; SALT, NAMELY, SEA SALT; SPICE BLENDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by FOODTRUST of Prince Edward Island Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FOODTRUST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |