Drawing for Serial No. 76977879

USPTO serial 76977879

Serial No. 76977879

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3142746Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 12, 2006
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 76977879?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Smith

Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg P.C.1600 JFK Blvd., 2nd FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043catering services, restaurant and cafeteria services; all in relation to sago, turnip cake, taro cake, Chinese New Year cake; edible ices, puddings, turtle and poris cocos based puddings, herbal tea, chrysanthemum tea, fruit drinks and fruit juicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 13, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 26, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 12, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 29, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 16, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jun 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Jan 9, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 14, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 1, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 1, 2005CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 2, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance