USPTO serial 76977910
KOMATSU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2009
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KOMATSU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sang Eun Lee
Sang Eun Lee Greenberg Traurig, LLP2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5200Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Industrial oils and greases; solid industrial lubricants; fuels for motor vehicles, namely, [gasoline, crude oils, ]artificial oils[, kerosene, liquefied petroleum gases, coal gases and natural gases] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Working clothing, namely, coats, jackets, trousers, pants, sweaters, shirts, vests and waistcoats, socks and stockings, gloves and mittens, neckties, neckerchieves, scarves, bandanas, mufflers, nightcaps, belts for clothing; [footwear, namely, work shoes and boots;] headgear, namely, hats, caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | [Action skill games; arcade games; board games; billiard game equipments, namely, billiard cues, billiard balls, billiard table and billiard markers; playthings, namely, plush toys, sandbox toys, dolls and playsets therefor; gymnastic apparatus and sporting articles, namely, vaulting horses, training stools, horizontal bars, baseball and softball implements, namely, baseball gloves, hard baseballs, softballs, rubber baseballs, batting gloves, backstops, baseball nets, baseball bats, baseball bat cases, baseball bases and catchers' masks; ball game implements, namely, shoulder pads for ball games, shin pads and guards for ball games, rubber tube for sporting balls, mounted inside the ball to maintain air within the tube, ball nets for ball games for volleyballs, basketballs, soccer, polo and table tennis, knee pads guards as sports articles, balls for ball games; tennis and badminton implements, namely, hard tennis balls, badminton shuttlecocks, soft tennis balls, nets for tennis and badminton, rackets for tennis and badminton, guts for rackets for tennis or badminton, racket cases for tennis and badminton;] golf implements, namely, golf bags, golf clubs, golf ball markers, golf tees, gloves, golf balls, putting practice mats, skiing implements, namely, seal skins for covering skis, skis, ski edges, ski cases, ski bindings, scrapers for skis, ski poles[; chest expanders, fishing tackle; playing cards] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOMATSU SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named KOMATSU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |