Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76977915?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76977915. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PENNY ARCADE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76977915, the listed owner(s) include: Commerce Bancorp, Inc., Commerce Bancorp, Inc., THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK.

What is USPTO serial number 76977915?

Serial number 76977915 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PENNY ARCADE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover PENNY ARCADE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76977915

PENNY ARCADE

Q: What is the current status of PENNY ARCADE?

PENNY ARCADE (76977915) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Oct 18, 2004
Status date: Apr 27, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENNY ARCADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
Cherry Hill, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
Cherry Hill, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
TORONTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence R. Robins

Lawrence R. Robins FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER L.L901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of lesson plans and teaching aids in the form of activity books, workbooks, handbooks, worksheets, charts, and illustrations in the fields of banking and finance	ACTIVE	—
041	Educational services in the nature of conducting children's programs in the fields of banking and financial services, featuring school presentations and contest development, and guided educational tours of bank branches; and educational services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring educational information, and online non-downloadable teaching aids in the form of educational games and puzzles in the fields of banking and finance	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 17, 2009	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Apr 27, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 24, 2008	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Sep 24, 2008	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Sep 24, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Mar 21, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Mar 21, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2008	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2008	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 25, 2007	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Sep 25, 2007	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Sep 25, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2007	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Mar 26, 2007	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Mar 26, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
May 16, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
May 10, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 17, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 17, 2006	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Apr 17, 2006	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Apr 17, 2006	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Mar 17, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 28, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 28, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2006	MNDA	NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED	—
Jan 23, 2006	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Dec 14, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Nov 21, 2005	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
Nov 21, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 21, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 26, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 26, 2005	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 26, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 3, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—