USPTO serial 76977952
N NORINCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with N NORINCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
China North Industries Corporation
Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
China North Industries Corporation
Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
China North Industries Corporation
Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael H. Selter
Michael H. Selter Manelli Denison & Selter PLLC2000 M Street, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Detonating cord, explosives, detonators for mines, explosive powders, fireworks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by China North Industries Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named N NORINCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |