USPTO serial 76977991
CALL · CLICK · CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2006
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CALL · CLICK · CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ON, CA
Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5E3, CA
Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael K. Fretwell
Michael K. Fretwell Laubscher & Fretwell P.C.222 Severn Ave, Suite 27, Bldg. 3-AAnnapolis, MD 21403United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Computer dating services, namely, telephone and web-based meeting and dating services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST MEDIA GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST MEDIA GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRST MEDIA GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CALL · CLICK · CONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |