USPTO serial 76978059
INTTIMO BY WET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3114763Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTTIMO BY WET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valencia, CA
LAS VEGAS, NV
Valencia, CA
Valencia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Kolodziej
DANIEL J KOLODZIEJ TRYGSTAD SCHWAB & TRYGSTAD1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 1104LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Massage oils; essential oils for personal use; aroma therapy products, namely, scented oils and lotions used to produce aromas when heated, bath products namely, oil, creams, lotions, namely, body creams, and oils; and body lotions; and cosmetics * but specifically excluding: medicated and non-medicated intimate hygiene washes, medicated and non-medicated pre-moistened wipes, medicated and non-medicated pre-moistened towelettes and medicated and non-medicated pre-moistened tissues * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trigg Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TRIGG LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Trigg Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trigg Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INTTIMO BY WET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |