USPTO serial 76978125
INDEPENDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDEPENDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY
LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, HAIR LOTIONS; COSMETICS, SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS, TANNING ACCELERATOR CREAMS AND LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UV-POWER LICHT GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by UV-POWER LICHT GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MUELHENS GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INDEPENDENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |