USPTO serial 76978177
KOURION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOURION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A Walker
PATRICIA A WALKER WALKER & JOCKE231 S BROADWAYMEDINA, OH 44256-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | medical and medical diagnostic research services in the field of diagnostic transplantation, biochip technology, chemical and biochemical examination, microbiological special examination and stem cell donor and transplant agency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |