Drawing for VILLAS

USPTO serial 76978266

VILLAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VILLAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, namely, board games, ring games, stand alone electronic game machines; amusement game machines and parts and fittings therefor; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, card games, dice games and games of chance; balls, namely, rubber action balls, sport balls, billiard balls; marbles; dominoes; cards, namely, playing cards, bingo cards; game tables; darts; dice; cups for dice; draughtboards in the nature of checker boards; sporting equipment, namely, baseballs, baseball bats, hockey sticks, hockey pucks, footballs, tennis racquets, soccer balls, rugby balls, cricket bats, cricket balls, and basketballs; roulette wheels, roulette chips, poker chipsACTIVE—
041Casino entertainment services; entertainment services in the nature of casino gaming services; entertainment services, namely, production of theater and musical shows; and night club and variety entertainment, namely, theatrical and musical floor shows provided at discotheques, theatres and nightclubs; amusement arcade services; gaming services related to blackjack, keno, craps, roulette, poker, slot machines, pontoon, boule, baccarat, punto banco, chemin de fer, mini-dice, fan tan, sic bo, pai gow, pai gow poker, lucky wheel, casino war, red dog, and video poker machines; casino and night club services; providing recreational facilities, namely, swimming pools, gymnasiums, health clubs, exercise clubs and exercise facilities; planning entertainment and sports competitions; booking of seats for shows; providing sports facilities; planning, arranging and conducting of entertainment and sports competitions; off track betting services; bingo hall services; providing on-line electronic nondownloadable publications, namely, bulletins, newsletters, articles and magazines in relation to sports events results, news events, offers of bets, and betting odds; publication of on-line publications of electronic books and journals in the field of sports events results, news events, offers of bets, and betting odds; non-downloadable on-line games; and provision of games by means of a computer based systemACTIVE—
043Hotel, restaurant, bar, and catering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 1, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Jul 28, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 26, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance