USPTO serial 76978270
ULTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3851968Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami, FL
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Roxanne Elings
G. ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hard drives; notebook/laptop computers; CD-rom drives; computer memory; rack mount computer server enclosures; tower computer server enclosures; customizable tower computer servers; card/graphic computer workstations; floppy disc drives; external computer hard drives; notebook computer stand; computer notebook carrying case; computer port replicators; computer converters; computer projectors and projector mounts; LCD television sets; computer graphic cards; camera cases; wireless video cameras; computer voltage regulators; power inverters; computer network adapters and switches; video and component switch boxes; computer Ethernet adapters; computer flash card burners; data destroyer software for use in erasing and destroying data; stand-alone CD duplicator systems consisting of CD writers programmed to make multiple copies of CDs; VCR/DVD player/recorder; video editing component; PC to TV video converters; computer disc drives; computer DVD drivers; computer USB drives; virus scan, anti-hacker and spam killer software; desk mount monitor arms; personal computer workstations comprising computers, monitors and keyboards; computer workstations shelving systems consisting of shelves mounting brackets and hardware; computer workstation components in the nature of heavy-duty lan furniture supports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Ink jet computer paper, and paper | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STREAK PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STREAK PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Systemax, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ULTRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |