CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MEADOWLANDS XANADU

USPTO serial 76978281

MEADOWLANDS XANADU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3433807Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MEADOWLANDS XANADU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Regan J. Fay

REGAN J. FAY JONES DAYNORTH POINT, 901 LAKESIDE AVENUECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037real estate development featuring planned entertainment mixed use and retail mixed useSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 4, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2015C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Aug 10, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 7, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 31, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 10, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance