USPTO serial 76978304
OPTICLITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OPTICLITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
Cranford, NJ, US
NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
Cranford, NJ, US
NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS LLC
CRANFORD, NJ, US
NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
Cranford, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle Cohen Esq.
Danielle Cohen Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole, LLP1345 6th AvenueFloor 15New York, NY 10105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Artificial Christmas trees featuring either one or both of electric lights and fiber optic lights | ACTIVE | Oct 11, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHRISTMAS PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named OPTICLITES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |