Drawing for 365 ORGANIC EVERYDAY VALUE

USPTO serial 76978315

365 ORGANIC EVERYDAY VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 365 ORGANIC EVERYDAY VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Graff

Christopher L. Graff Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C.1616 S. Voss Rd., Suite 750Houston, TX 77057-2631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Organic products namely, laundry detergent, liquid and dry dishwashing soap, all purpose cleaning preparations, glass cleaning preparations, scouring cleaning preparations and essential oil extracts for personal use, toothpaste, hair shampoo, skin soap, skin and moisturizing lotion and hair conditioners, bath and shower gelsACTIVE—
016Organic products namely, paper towels, toilet paper, paper napkins, paper coffee filtersACTIVE—
029Organic products namely, frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, soups, fruit sauces, potato and fruit-based snack foods, potato and fruit-based chips, frozen fruits, processed tomatoes, tomato sauce and paste, chili, frozen potato dishes, processed beans, bean dip, dried fruit, processed nuts, trail snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nut and/or raisins, nut butters, jams, marmalade, fruit spreads, olive oil, cooking oil, margarine, canned tuna, milk, half and half, cream cheese, cheeses, soy-based and rice-based food beverages used as a milk substitute, cheese, yogurt, processed vegetables and processed fruitsACTIVE—
030Organic products namely, processed cereals, processed grains, pasta, macaroni and cheese, granola, ready to eat cereal-based food bars, rice-based food bars, wheat-based food bars, processed popcorn, corn-based chips, flour-based chips, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, confectionery chips for baking, pretzels, crackers, salad dressing, mayonnaise, ketchup, mustard, relish, hot sauce, spices, natural sweeteners, honey, extracts used as a flavoring, coffee, pasta sauce, marinades, chocolate syrup, chocolate chips, barbecue sauces, vinegar, cheese sauce, salsas, pizza, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, whole grain and dry fruit bar, candy, frozen yogurt, frozen fruit bars, ice cream, sorbet, cookies, frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of pasta or rice, waffles and processed herbsACTIVE—
031Organic products namely, unprocessed cereals, unprocessed popcorn, unprocessed fruit, unprocessed vegetables, unprocessed herbs, unprocessed beans and rice, unprocessed grains for eating and pet foodACTIVE—
032Organic products namely, fresh and concentrated fruit juices, fresh and concentrated vegetable juices, fresh and concentrated fruit and vegetable juice combinations, soft drinks, sports drinks, aloe vera drinks, sparkling water, spring water and bottle drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Aug 31, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance