USPTO serial 76978381
DANGER RANGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANGER RANGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Knoxville, TN
Knoxville, TN
CHARLOTTE, NC
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger
Louis M. Heidelberger Gibbons P.C.1700 Two Logan Square, 18th & Arch StreePhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Primal Combat Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Primal Combat Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PERSONAL & CHILD SAFETY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCATIONAL ADVENTURES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DANGER RANGERS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |