USPTO serial 76978427
MYTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Krafte
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | RINGS, EARRINGS, NECKLACES, BRACELETS, BROOCHES, PINS, TIE CLIPS, TIE PINS, ALL THE FOREGOING OF PRECIOUS METAL AND STONES; TIME PIECES, NAMELY, CLOCKS, WATCHES AND CHRONOGRAPHS FOR USE AS WATCHES, WATCH BANDS, WATCH CHAINS, WRIST WATCHES, STOP WATCHES; JEWELRY, COSTUME JEWELRY; JEWELRY OF IMITATION GOLD AND SILVER; JEWELRY OF DIAMONDS, PEARLS, STERLING SILVER, GOLD AND SILVER, PRECIOUS METAL, PRECIOUS STONES, PLATINUM, SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES; JEWELRY CASES OF PRECIOUS METAL; VASES OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BED COVERINGS AND BED LINEN, NAMELY, COTTON BED BLANKETS, WOOL BED BLANKETS, BED SPREADS, BED SHEETS, BED QUILTS; PILLOW SHAMS, PILLOW SLIPS, PILLOW COVERS, PILLOW CASES; DUVET COVERS; TABLE COVERS, NAMELY, TABLE LINEN, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER, TABLE LINEN, NAMELY, TABLE MATS AND TABLE NAPKINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Time Art Development Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Time Art Development Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named MYTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |