USPTO serial 76978456
STARCUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3230371Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STARCUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIN-00130 HELSINKI, FI
FIN-00130 HELSINKI, FI
FIN-00130 HELSINKI, FI
HELSINKI, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Rosenbloum
ROBERT A ROSENBLOUM GREENBERG TRAUIG LLP3290 NORTHSIDE PKWY STE 400ATLANTA, GA 30327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA ON-LINE AND WIRELESS ADVERTISEMENTS, ADVERTISING, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTER FOR OTHERS, AND MARKET RESEARCH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |