USPTO serial 76978526
PIERCE FAMILY OF COMPANIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3256830Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIERCE FAMILY OF COMPANIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES S LEIGH
JAMES S LEIGH KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP1 WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, advertising the products and services of others through printed publications and online advertising, such print and online advertising featuring trucks, trailers, lifting and heavy equipment of others, clothing, and horses and horse equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2006 |
| 040 | printing services, namely, designing and printing auction brochures for auctioneers; printing menus, flyers, newsletters, brochures, annual reports, posters, magazines, promotional and product sheets and catalogs, CD and DVD packaging inserts, software packaging, limited edition prints, and greeting cards for distribution by others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2006 |
| 042 | computer internet services, namely, website design, development, hosting, programming, monitoring, updating, content management, maintenance services, and domain name registration services, all for helping dealers and distributors display and distribute their inventories of goods online | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MLS, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MLS, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MLS, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PIERCE FAMILY OF COMPANIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |