USPTO serial 76978538
YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Rundelli
Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCleveland, OH 44114-1607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal goods, namely, [ metal bottle caps, non-precious metal sculptures, ] metal over the door racks, [ metal panel pin on clips, metal house numbers, metal magnetic squeeze clip closures, magnetic holders for metal squeeze clip closures ] | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2004 |
| 020 | Metal racks for clothing, hats, aprons, coats, jackets, scarves, brooms, mops, dustpans, umbrellas, bags, ladders, and rakes; [ non-metal housewares, namely, non-metal bottle caps, non-metal bottle closures, non-metal magnetic squeeze clip closures, plastic boxes, non-metal closures for bottles and containers for personal hygienic and cosmetic articles, plastic container closures, picture frames, furniture mirrors, fog free mirrors, non-metal pegs, storage racks for glasses, wood racks, glass racks, non-metal boxes, plastic box containing a magnet for storage of coupons, magnetic photo frames, drawer organizer trays, drawer organizer dividers, sink mats, sink protection mats, sink grid mats ] | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2004 |
| 021 | [ Household accessories, namely, squeegees, sponge trays, magnetic broom holders, magnetic cups, metal cups, perfume atomizers sold empty; ] housewares, namely, [ baskets made of plastic, ] waste paper baskets, [ plastic bath racks, plastic drying racks, ] beverageware, [ bottles sold empty, plastic coasters, coasters not of paper or table linen, bowls, soap boxes, boxes for dispensing paper towels, candle holders not of precious metal, ] all purpose portable containers, soap containers, [ containers for food or beverage, containers for household or kitchen use, containers in the nature of magnetic cups and holders for household or kitchen use, ] cups, plastic cups, drinking vessels, garbage cans; [ household utensils, namely, dish drainers, namely, plastic racks for drying dishes, drain board mats, sink saddles, scrubber and sponge holders, compost container for sinks, sink trays, mug racks, recipe boxes, arch clips, broom holders, mugs, pail, salad bowls, corner shelves for sinks, soap cradles, sponge cradles, scrub pad holders, compost containers for countertops, drain board mats, dish drainers, sink trays, hanging baskets for straddling a double sink, baskets securable to sinks for draining scrubbers and towel bars; household accessories, namely, metal racks for drying dishes; hand pumped flavor sprayers for food; metal trivets; non-precious metal candle holders ] | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 14, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |