USPTO serial 76978589
CHEF'S HELPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEF'S HELPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TUESDAY MORNING PARTNERS, LTD.
DALLAS, TX
Westland, MI
Westland, MI
Westland, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole B. Emmons
Nicole B. Emmons Baker & McKenzie LLP2001 Ross AvenueSuite 2300Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring cups, measuring spoons; and meat thermometers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TUESDAY MORNING PARTNERS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CHEF'S HELPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |