USPTO serial 76978625
ONE STROKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE STROKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dan R. Musick, Esq.
DAN R MUSICK ESQ W ECHP O BOX 7600NORCROSS, GA 30091-7600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Laminated Painting Teaching Guides, Rub-On Decals, and books in the field of arts and crafts painting | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |