USPTO serial 76978634
FOODFIGHT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362891Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOODFIGHT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THRESHOLD ANIMATION STUDIOS, INC.
SANTA MONICA, CA
THRESHOLD ANIMATION STUDIOS, INC.
SANTA MONICA, CA
Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
Santa Monica, CA
Other trademarks owned by Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenifer de Wolf Paine
JENIFER DE WOLF PAINE TRADEMARK FILE ROOM (18-106)PROSKAUER ROSE LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036-8299Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's books, picture books, coloring books, activity books for children, books in the field of cartoons, artist's brushes, hobby craft kits comprising painting sets, paint kits comprised of paint and paint brushes and stickers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THRESHOLD ANIMATION STUDIOS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THRESHOLD ANIMATION STUDIOS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Threshold Digital Research Labs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FOODFIGHT!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |