USPTO serial 76978656
SHIPYARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIPYARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Markva
8322-A Traford LaneSpringfield, VA 22152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Real estate services, namely, advertising and marketing of residential and commercial properties, and recreational amenities; and real estate marketing services, namely, online services featuring tours and listing of residential and commercial real estate; administration and coordination of club and amenities related recreational activities for individuals who wish to participate in offered recreational activities, namely, fitness activities, aerobics, biking, tennis, swimming, and team league sports; marina management services, namely, the operation of yacht club and water recreation facilities for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate brokerage and listings; real property leasing and rentals; management of rental properties; and real estate management services, namely, the management of property within a planned community | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | boat fueling services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Marina operation services, namely, dockage and dry storage services; long-term and short-term boat storage and wet slip rentals; boat launch services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Recreational services in the nature of pools, multi-purpose sports fields, walking and jogging trails; providing facilities for recreation activities; club services, namely, yacht club services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LANDMAR GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LANDMAR GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SHIPYARDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |