USPTO serial 76978657
RENDEZVOUS ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340634Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RENDEZVOUS ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA MONICA, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A. Feinswog
KENNETH A FEINSWOG6100 CENTER DR STE 630LOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded videocassettes and compact discs featuring musical performances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENDEZVOUS ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cody, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Cody, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Cody, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Katz, Hyman
- Other trademarks owned by Katz, Hyman
- Other trademarks owned by Katz, Hyman
- Other trademarks owned by Koz, Dave
- Other trademarks owned by Koz, Dave
- Other trademarks owned by Koz, Dave
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RENDEZVOUS ENTERTAINMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |