USPTO serial 76978877
EPI EXTRUTECH PLASTICS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EPI EXTRUTECH PLASTICS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TALLAHASSEE, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Kuborn
Joseph D. Kuborn Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP100 East Wisconsin AvenueSuite 1100Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PLASTIC PROFILE EXTRUSIONS, NAMELY, PIPES FOR CENTRAL VACUUMS | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 2007 |
| 019 | PLASTIC PROFILE EXTRUSIONS TO CONSTRUCT SHUTTERS, NAMELY, STILES, RAILS, L-FRAMES, Z-FRAMES, TILT ROD, HOLE STRIPS AND MOUNTING STRIPS; PLASTIC PROFILE EXTRUSIONS FOR BUILDING, NAMELY, DECORATIVE MOLDING, TRIM, SILLS, PANELS, PARTITION WALLS, DOOR JAMBS, J-TRIM, DOORS, DOOR FRAMES, SLAT WALL, NAMELY, INTERLOCKING INTERIOR PANELING AND EXTERIOR SIDING, CEILING PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PLASTIC PROFILE EXTRUSIONS TO CONSTRUCT SHUTTERS, NAMELY, LOUVERS | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EPI 04, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Skagfield Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Skagfield Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Skagfield Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named EPI EXTRUTECH PLASTICS, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 21, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |