USPTO serial 76978894
YAMAHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with YAMAHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, JP
Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, JP
YAMAHA HATSUDOKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SHIZUOKA-KEN, JP
YAMAHA HATSUDOKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SHIZUOKA-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Accessories for musical instruments, namely, cork greases, bore oils, key oils, lever oils, rotor oils, rotor spindle oils, slide creams, slide greases, tuning slide oils, valve oils, lubricants for musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Yamaha Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by YAMAHA HATSUDOKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by YAMAHA HATSUDOKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named YAMAHA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ISIU | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE(NOA)-ITU REQUEST | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |