Drawing for FEARLESS

USPTO serial 76979074

FEARLESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEARLESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D. LANQUIST, JR. WADDEY & PATTERSON, P.C.1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books featuring religion; Printed matter, namely, devotionals; Study Guides featuring religious topics; Calendars featuring religious topicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 24, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2010MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
May 27, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 27, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 24, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 3, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance