USPTO serial 76979103
SECURE SLIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECURE SLIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Wyatt
DOUGLAS W. WYATT Wyatt, Gerber & O'Rourke, LLP99 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | ELEVATOR INSTALLATION AND REPAIR | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2011 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |