USPTO serial 76979230
STURGIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4440406Status 712
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2013
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STURGIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
STURGIS, SD
Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
Sturgis, SD
Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
Sturgis, SD
STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
STURGIS, SD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Sneed
Jason M. Sneed SNEED PLLC445 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE 400DAVIDSON, NC 28036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal license plates, non-luminous and non-mechanical metal signs, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1996 |
| 009 | [ Computer mouse pads, protective or safety helmets, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2012 |
| 012 | [ License plate holders and motorcycle handlebar grips, and motorcycle bags, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
| 014 | [ Jewelry, watch bands, non-monetary coins, medallions, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2011 |
| 018 | [ Wallets, book bags, shoulder bags, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
| 021 | [ Grease and polish rags, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2011 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, knit shirts, sport shirts, head bands, all of the aforementioned goods relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2010 |
| 035 | Catalog, retail store and wholesale store services featuring general merchandise and souvenirs relating to the STURGIS motorcycle rally | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2010 |
| 041 | Live music concerts | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named STURGIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2023 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | ORDR | COURT ORDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |