Drawing for OLD NAVY

USPTO serial 77000588

OLD NAVY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLD NAVY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank Goldberg

2 FOLSOM STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Consumable pet chews; Digestible chewing bones for dogs; Dog biscuits; Dog food; Dog treats ; Edible food for animals for chewing; Food for animalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 2, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 30, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 23, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 8, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Apr 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2006RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
Dec 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance