Drawing for THE MONTECITO DIET

USPTO serial 77000589

THE MONTECITO DIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MONTECITO DIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Posa

JOHN G POSA GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of health, nutrition, illness prevention, detoxification, and diet and lifestyle choicesACTIVE—
044Providing health information; providing information in the field of nutritional counseling; providing information in the field of illness prevention, diet, detoxification, and lifestyle wellness choices; providing global computer websites featuring information in the field of health, nutrition, illness prevention, detoxification, and diet and lifestyle wellness choicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2010NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 28, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Sep 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 17, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2009EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Nov 18, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 7, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 19, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 19, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 18, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 20, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance